Thomas Fancutt vs Tai Sach Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W L W L L
Form
W W L W L W L W W LH2H: Fancutt 1 - 0 Sach
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fancutt winning 2 and Sach winning 1. The last match between Fancutt and Sach was at the M25 Darwin, 20-09-2023, First, Hard with Thomas Fancutt getting the victory 7-5 6-7(7) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Thomas Fancutt | 1 |
| Tai Sach | 0 |
M25 Darwin(20-09-2023)
7
5
6
7
6
4
| Fancutt | Stats | Sach |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (9-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 821 | Ranking | N/A |
| 382 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 30 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (235-210) | Career Total W/L | 58% (117-86) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-7(7) 6-4 |
Stats 
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Tai Sach
72%
(
73 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
54 of
71)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
28 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 16 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 3:8:0 | Average Match Time | 3:8:0 |
| 72% (73/101) | 1st Serve % | 64% (71/111) |
| 75% (55/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (54/71) |
| 64% (18/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (18/40) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 35% (39/111) | Return Points Win % | 28% (28/101) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Thomas Fancutt
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Thomas Fancutt
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Edward Winter
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Thomas Fancutt
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Thijmen Loof
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Thomas Fancutt
57%
(
62 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
11
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
8
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
47 of
60)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
34 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Hanyi Liu
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Thomas Fancutt
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yurii Dzhavakian
Player
Thomas Fancutt
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tai Sach Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yuto Oki
Player
Tai Sach
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(6) 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Tai Sach
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tai Sach
Player
Hiromasa Koyama
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Tai Sach
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tai Sach
Player
Ryo Tabata
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tai Sach
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (235/210) | Win/Loss | 58% (117/86) |
| 52% (519/478) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (264/193) |
| 51% (4856/4652) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2402/2090) |
| 52% (162/148) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (112/80) |
| 53% (49/44) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) |
| 38% (5/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (19/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.59 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 2719 | Aces Total | 353 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1348 | Total Double Faults | 302 |
| 1:23:6 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 481.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 225.87 |
| 58% (14985/25693) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4550/7510) |
| 74% (11041/14985) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3076/4550) |
| 49% (5273/10708) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1443/2960) |
| 41% (911/2221) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (311/765) |
| 37% (9553/25783) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3099/7735) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (39/56) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (196/151) | Futures W/L | 58% (117/85) |
| 54% (232/431) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (116/202) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (63/159) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (27/47) |
| 57% (67/117) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (21/53) |
| 84% (240/202) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (122/107) |
| 16% (240/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (122/15) |
| 16% (205/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (80/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
